MAL

MAL

Company

Company

LG Electronics

LG Electronics

Duration

Duration

AUGUST 2023 - JULY 2024

AUGUST 2023 - JULY 2024

Cutting revision cycles by 50% with an AI SaaS verification tool, enabling faster and accurate global workflow.

Cutting revision cycles by 50% with an AI SaaS verification tool, enabling faster and accurate global workflow.

Overview

Overview

LG’s global teams create thousands of contents each year across appliances, apps, and digital products. Before it goes live, it must be verified for accuracy, grammar error, consistency, and brand tone — a process that inconsistent, and heavily manual. I designed MAL (Machine-Assisted Language), an internal AI-driven verification platform, to make that process scalable. But this wasn’t just a design problem — it was an organizational challenge. I had to navigate legacy workflows, pushback from global teams resistant to change, and massive data audit. My role was to create the systems — tone, rules, and workflows — that AI could thrive in, while winning trust from stakeholders across the company.

LG’s global teams create thousands of contents each year across appliances, apps, and digital products. Before it goes live, it must be verified for accuracy, grammar error, consistency, and brand tone — a process that inconsistent, and heavily manual. I designed MAL (Machine-Assisted Language), an internal AI-driven verification platform, to make that process scalable. But this wasn’t just a design problem — it was an organizational challenge. I had to navigate legacy workflows, pushback from global teams resistant to change, and massive data audit. My role was to create the systems — tone, rules, and workflows — that AI could thrive in, while winning trust from stakeholders across the company.

Role

Role

Product Designer

Product Designer

Platform

Platform

Internal SaaS tool

Internal SaaS tool

Scope

Scope

Product Design, AI Platform Design, Stakeholder Alignment, Content, UX Writing

Product Design, AI Platform Design, Stakeholder Alignment, Content, UX Writing

Team

Team

Product Manager, UX Writer, 3 Engineers, Technical Writers

Product Manager, UX Writer, 3 Engineers, Technical Writers

Starting in the Unknown

Starting in the Unknown

Significant inefficiency due to tangled workflow and inconsistencies across legacy contents.

Significant inefficiency due to tangled workflow and inconsistencies across legacy contents.

LG’s global product, both physical and digital teams were dealing with an enormous challenge: - Thousands of UX writing assets produced annually, across different product lines. - No consistent verification process — each division had its own way of checking content. - Legacy files full of inconsistencies, making automation nearly impossible. The result: verification took weeks, slowed down product launches, and created friction across teams.

LG’s global product, both physical and digital teams were dealing with an enormous challenge: - Thousands of UX writing assets produced annually, across different product lines. - No consistent verification process — each division had its own way of checking content. - Legacy files full of inconsistencies, making automation nearly impossible. The result: verification took weeks, slowed down product launches, and created friction across teams.

Why This Project Mattered

Why This Project Mattered

We needed a way to verify massive amounts of content efficiently.

We needed a way to verify massive amounts of content efficiently.

My first assumption was that the problem was primarily a tooling gap.

My First Hypothesis

My First Hypothesis

My first assumption was that the problem was primarily a tooling gap.

My first assumption was that the problem was primarily a tooling gap.

I though, if we could automate verification using AI, teams would naturally adopt the new system. I mean, on paper, it sounded pretty straightforward: Step 1. Train AI on existing content. Step 2. Automate verification checks. Step 3. Save teams time and reduce errors. So simple. No?

I though, if we could automate verification using AI, teams would naturally adopt the new system. I mean, on paper, it sounded pretty straightforward: Step 1. Train AI on existing content. Step 2. Automate verification checks. Step 3. Save teams time and reduce errors. So simple. No?

But...we got stuck.

But...we got stuck.

As I dug deeper, it became clear that the problem wasn't just technical. It was cultural and organizational.

As I dug deeper, it became clear that the problem wasn't just technical. It was cultural and organizational.

This wasn’t just a design problem — it was a product–market fit problem inside the organization. Before we could train AI, we had to fix the system it lived in one by one.

This wasn’t just a design problem — it was a product–market fit problem inside the organization. Before we could train AI, we had to fix the system it lived in one by one.

Rethinking the Approach

Rethinking the Approach

Through audits, and stakeholder interviews, I realized before we even get to the AI part, we need to start with language and building consistency.

Through audits, and stakeholder interviews, I realized before we even get to the AI part, we need to start with language and building consistency.

We had to first: Establish a unified brand tone and style guide across teams. Design scalable verification rules for AI to check against. Create a user flow that respected how teams actually worked, while nudging them toward the new system.

We had to first: Establish a unified brand tone and style guide across teams. Design scalable verification rules for AI to check against. Create a user flow that respected how teams actually worked, while nudging them toward the new system.

Designing MAL

Designing MAL

The team made a decision to design MAL as a web app rather than a standalone tool. This was driven by two constraints:

The team made a decision to design MAL as a web app rather than a standalone tool. This was driven by two constraints:

1. Security Constraints: All data needed to remain within the LG cloud ecosystem. 2. Adoption Concerns: Requiring a separate login & app download would create friction and resistance. By embedding MAL within existing systems, we minimized the sense of “one more thing to manage” and kept workflows seamless.

1. Security Constraints: All data needed to remain within the LG cloud ecosystem. 2. Adoption Concerns: Requiring a separate login & app download would create friction and resistance. By embedding MAL within existing systems, we minimized the sense of “one more thing to manage” and kept workflows seamless.

With the contraints in mind, I started to ideate and build MAL around these three design pillars:

With the contraints in mind, I started to ideate and build MAL around these three design pillars:

1. Systems Thinking 2. Seamless AI Integration 3. Non-Disruptive Design

1. Systems Thinking 2. Seamless AI Integration 3. Non-Disruptive Design

  • Solutions

  • Solutions

  1. Systems Thinking: Building from Ground Up
  1. Systems Thinking: Building from Ground Up

I collaborated with UX writers and global stakeholders to create a universal brand guideline that respected each division’s restrictions while unifying core standards. I focused on capturing brand rules, grammar hierarchies, and division-specific requirements.

I collaborated with UX writers and global stakeholders to create a universal brand guideline that respected each division’s restrictions while unifying core standards. I focused on capturing brand rules, grammar hierarchies, and division-specific requirements.

  1. Seamless AI Integration: Training for Trust
  1. Seamless AI Integration: Training for Trust

Once we had a consistent dataset, I partnered with engineers to separate the database into two parts: 1. Label Data (the content being verified) 2. Rule Data (the standards it must meet) This structure allowed us to train AI models that could search, verify, and cross-check brand guidelines across divisions. (image above) Then I moved on to actual platform design. I designed the outputs to be explainable: each revision was flagged with a clear before/after indication, so users understood why something was flagged and why it needed correction. This transparency was critical in building trust with skeptical teams.

Once we had a consistent dataset, I partnered with engineers to separate the database into two parts: 1. Label Data (the content being verified) 2. Rule Data (the standards it must meet) This structure allowed us to train AI models that could search, verify, and cross-check brand guidelines across divisions. (image above) Then I moved on to actual platform design. I designed the outputs to be explainable: each revision was flagged with a clear before/after indication, so users understood why something was flagged and why it needed correction. This transparency was critical in building trust with skeptical teams.

  1. Non-Disruptive Design: Meeting Users Where They Are
  1. Non-Disruptive Design: Meeting Users Where They Are

From my earliest interviews, one theme was loud and clear: “We don’t have time to learn another tool.” This resistance shaped my design philosophy. Instead of introducing a complex interface, I deliberately designed MAL to feel familiar and frictionless. The UI mimics a simple search engine — one box, one primary action. Users could toggle between three options (verify sentence, Excel, or HTML). By keeping the experience minimal, adoption felt almost effortless.

From my earliest interviews, one theme was loud and clear: “We don’t have time to learn another tool.” This resistance shaped my design philosophy. Instead of introducing a complex interface, I deliberately designed MAL to feel familiar and frictionless. The UI mimics a simple search engine — one box, one primary action. Users could toggle between three options (verify sentence, Excel, or HTML). By keeping the experience minimal, adoption felt almost effortless.

Result: What Changed

Result: What Changed

The first version of MAL rolled out across select LG teams — and the results spoke for themselves:

The first version of MAL rolled out across select LG teams — and the results spoke for themselves:

But the biggest effect wasn’t just efficiency. It was laying the foundation for AI to scale responsibly across LG. MAL created the structure — tone, rules, workflows — that made future automation possible.

Reflection

Reflection

Enterprise design isn’t just about interfaces — it’s about building systems that align people, process, and technology at scale.

Enterprise design isn’t just about interfaces — it’s about building systems that align people, process, and technology at scale.

This project taught me that designing at enterprise scale is as much about people as it is about tools. I learned how to navigate global workflows, balancing complexity with simplicity so the system was powerful enough to scale yet easy for teams to adopt. I saw firsthand how alignment requires patience and clear communication, especially when priorities conflict across functions and time zones. And I came to appreciate the trade-offs of AI in practice — it could accelerate reviews, but cultural nuance still demanded human judgment. In the end, the real design challenge wasn’t just building a tool, but building trust in the system around it.

This project taught me that designing at enterprise scale is as much about people as it is about tools. I learned how to navigate global workflows, balancing complexity with simplicity so the system was powerful enough to scale yet easy for teams to adopt. I saw firsthand how alignment requires patience and clear communication, especially when priorities conflict across functions and time zones. And I came to appreciate the trade-offs of AI in practice — it could accelerate reviews, but cultural nuance still demanded human judgment. In the end, the real design challenge wasn’t just building a tool, but building trust in the system around it.

PORTFOLIO

CHECK OUT SOME MORE

CHECK OUT SOME MORE

CHECK OUT SOME MORE

CHECK OUT SOME MORE